Possible werks

Possible Werks

Sad News

Death of Kenny Young

I went to the studio at CPC, where I do my editing. Just as I was preparing. Jen came into the room and asked me if I knew Kenny Young.
As I looked into her eyes I knew exactly what she was talking about. I didn't say anything, but I knew. Kenny Had died last thursday due to ongoing battle with Leukemia. Whats funny or peculiar You never know what you think of some one until they are gone. I mean I always liked him. and yet I never really knew the guy. I mean who was Kenny? My observations He was mysterious and yet down to earth.
Kenny to my knowledge He was a producer of many tv programs on the Phenomenon of UFO's. Over the years He has earned the reputation of being an expert in fact has been on a couple of TV Programs like Sightings and has been interviewed by Author Whitley Strieber. Which I had no Idea until just now. Also,
Young's UFO investigations have also been featured nationally on the 2-hour NBC Television program "CONFIRMATION" as well as "SIGHTINGS on The Sci-Fi Channel." He has appeared on numerous radio programs including "Strange Days Indeed with Errol Bruce Knapp," "The Jeff Rense Show," "Coast to Coast A.M. with Art Bell," "Late Night with George Noory," "The Sci-Zone with Bill Boshears," "The X-Zone with Rob McConnell," "The Jim Hickman Report" and many others.
With this much creditials Kenny has maintained a down to earth style in which everyone should emulate.
After Jen told me the Bad News I found it very difficult to get into editing my current project. Reason why is because of a superstition of mine, which is silly. and yet It seems to happen that people I know tend to Die in February
My Friend Rick, Peggy, A woman I used to date. She died of Cancer. My wife's Grandmother.
These are just a few examples, not hardly enough to say there is an epidemic. It's just something I've noticed. maybe because of these Deaths I've develope a bleak picture that surrounds the coldest most treacherous winter month.
This feeling is something I've had a great deal in shaking off. maybe its a guilt of some sort. Maybe I could have saved Rick or Peggy? I don't know, all I know is that I think about them sometimes... But this Post isn't about them. it's about Kenny.
I remeber Kenny was in one of the editing suites and He was looking at video tape. A woman sent him a impassioned letter about her UFO experiences. Kenny had a delema. On the tape was nothing more than just light reflecting off a satellite. Kenny Asked Me what I thought.
"How do I tell this woman that this isn't a UFO?"
This is the Kenny that I remember, considerate thoughtful and not one to step on people who have experiences that they don't undertstand. I really appreciated that he would ask me what I thought unfortuntately we both saw the same thing. A satellite.
Kenny man Sorry Your gone. it's not going to be the same without you, and I know there a Many people down here that already miss you. I was routing for you. If there is intelligent life else could you let me know some how?
I know its a Crazy Idea.

posted Tuesday, 8 February 2005

Stalking Your Stalker

A couple of years ago A good friend of mine told me that his sister was being Stalked by this Crazy guy who was obsessed by her. Being attractive or for whatever reson, really doesn't mean she or anyone else should be stalked for thousands of reasons. The best reasons thus far is that It's just creepy.
although... I guess I could get obsessed with somebody who knows? Maybe if I got my feelings hurt or someone was leading me on and wasn't being totally direct in telling me to get lost. or because they like the idea of someone is watching them. I could piss a few ladies off by saying this but I don't care I'm not a stalker.
I seriously doubt this is the issue in a majority of cases. but I'm sure it happens. In fact I've talked to many women who have fantasies of being Raped or Stalked. but the catch is you have to be their Fantasy guy. Unfortunately if your not some famous hunky guys it's not your lucky day.
You won't be successful if your Don knotts or Don Rickles, Mel Brooks or even me. But if anyone told me these guys were better looking than me, I would be really sad, in fact totally crushed. Okay I'm realistic I'm not the best looking guy in the world, but I'm better looking than Don Knots any day of the week.
Anyway after he told me about this I got this idea to put an end to stalking altogether I call It
Stalking Your Stalker
what you do is that you simply start following your stalker on his days off Stalking you. Go to his Job and watch him from the parking lot across the street with binoculars. If he spots you, You just peel out of there like a Bat of Hell. Have Notes or flowers sent to his office
Then get really intense. When he's not home, because He's probably at your house. God Only knows why.
break into his house, find his bath room. take your lip stick and write on his bathroom mirror.
YOU KNOW WHERE I LIVE!!!
That in itself would be a total shocker. or how about this idea. One morning when He wakes up. He finds you sitting at his kitchen table wearing his Pajamas, and eating his cereal.You turn to him with a smile, and say
"I gotta have my Pops"
In closing I'm not sure what sort of results you'll get doing all this. Could it get worse, will he prosecute. Will he feel violated? I'm not sure but something will happen.
Also I've noticed many people in my life have gone through some strange things with stalkers. these are ordinary people with ordinary lives. One instance my cousin wouldnt take her husband back so he took a kitchen knife and stabbed himself in the abdomen. A friend of mine has been stalked by both men and women. one woman was a lesbian who was stalking him. He was uncomfortable about this, Me I'm thinking how lucky can you get?
In light of all this I wonder what these people got that I haven't got..... just kidding.

posted Tuesday, 25 January 2005

A small list of Cd's I got just recently

Daft Punk Discovery
Stone Temple Pilots Purple
Stone Temple Pilots Thank You
Life Aquatic Film Soundtrack
Older Favorites from the top of my head
Fantastic Plastic Machine Luxury
Cornelius Phantasma
John Frusciante Shadows Collide with People
Radio Head get all of them
Komeda Poppa Svenska
Cocteau Twins heaven or Las Vegas

posted Monday, 24 January 2005

(sic)

Over the years I have thumbed through some political conservative papers and magazines and when I read it, i see this (sic) in some of the articles. I first noticed this in college. Now I never heard people actually say it. I'm curious if its short for something?
In a sentence It seems kind of subliminal. for example
Suzie went to the grocery store and baught a coloring book and some crayons and began coloring (sic) dolphins and a mongoose and Chickens. suzie had Fun!!!
I am very curious as to what the Fuck this means. Now that sentence was entirely mine but I see this when discussing democrats. I wanna know what this means.
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005
function pS(p){if(p.height>48){p.height=48;}}
El Borak made this comment,
Hi, Craig. (sic) means "thus, so", and is used in a quatation to indicate that an error or misspelling is in the original passage being quoted.
For example, I used it in this passage, "the straight and wholly(sic)" to indicate that even though "wholly" should have been "holy", I'm retaining the original author's usage.
It has nothing to do with Democrats and everything to do with respecting the author enough to not change his words, even to fix them...
comment added :: 23rd January 2005, 17:28 GMT

A little debate

I read this Blog which sparked a response to do a pretty good rant, which I will feature here. I cut an pasted his Blog Entry including my response on how I feel on this matter. please Enjoy.
Myopia: (n) a lack of foresight or discernment : a narrow view of something
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"> rdf:about="http://elborak.blog-city.com/" dc:identifier="http://elborak.blog-city.com/read/1023860.htm" dc:title="The Gay Marriage Catch-22" trackback:ping="http://elborak.blog-city.com/read/trackback/1023860.htm" />-->

The Gay Marriage Catch-22
This blog might not make any sense, because it's essentially a "brain dump" of a number of things that hit me while re-reading Jill Ensley's blog on gay marriage and thinking about Bill Horn's comment below. I have not really thought it through, so I would appreciate anyone wanting to punch holes in it...Back in college I read a book called "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller (as a side note, at the time, it seemed to me the funniest book I'd ever read, but when I started to re-read it 15 years later, it just struck me as sad). In the book, a Catch-22 was a legal or procedural oxymoron. For example, no one who was insane had to fly bombing runs, so if you wanted to get out of them, you just had to show you were insane. But, the fact of trying to get out of them proved your sanity, so you had to do them. If you were sane, you had to fly, if not, you didn't have to but wanted to. Either way, you flew, sane or not. The rules simply meant nothing.What has that to do with gay marriage?A couple of quotes from posters on Jill's blog struck me as the same kind of thing:"And that may be what angers me the most, the notion that this amendment could take away domestic partner rights from hundreds, thousands, of people.""Marriage is the last major barrier that separates gay people from the rest of the population.""Fine, then, if marriage is reserved for the straight and wholly(sic), then at least let same-sex couples who have been faithful to one another for many years receive the same benefits that married couples receive from the government."It seems that the most popular argument used for gay marriage is that marriage provides government benefits that gays are locked out of, so they want to get married just like straight people.But why do straight people want marriage? I've yet to see a straight couple get married for tax reasons or for insurance. Maybe it happens, I have just never seen it. Straight people that I know get married because it's the natural thing to do in order to create a home and a family.So, in other words, straights want to get married for x reason, but they get y benefits for doing so. Gays want to be able to get married, not for x reasons, but so they can get y benefits.The Catch-22? If you don't care about y, you can have it. If you want y, you can't have it.Maybe that makes sense of not, it just stuck me as odd. But what if Y is "separation from the rest of society" rather than government benefits? Does the lack of marriage separate gays? Well, let's ask it this way, is a hetero couple that's not married separated from society? No. From family and church, perhaps, but not from society so far as the law is concerned. Perhaps their cohabitation is technically unlawful, but as in Virginia, such laws have not been enforced for 4 generations and are tossed when they become an issue. So if you get married for x reasons, you get y in this case as well (not that it matters), but if you just want y, you can't have it. Catch-22.But what it seems to me is that the "approval" gays seek is more than just government approval. They want moral approval, for everyone else to say, "That's just fine". But that's not really something government can grant. Societal approval comes from the individuals in society, not from the laws that govern it (this one is weak, I know, as laws may be in some sense a 'gauge' of societal acceptance/approval). But since every time gay marriage hits the polls it loses, societal approval is not there.I don't know if this makes sense or not, as I'm just trying to think through a governmental "approach" to gay marriage. As a Christian, there's no issue...sodomy is outside God's design for Man and is therefore a sin. No amount of societal or legal approval can change that. But as an American, I don't believe that every sin ought to be illegal. The government ought to protect the rights we have as God's creation, not grant or deny them based on public opinion. The extent to which government ought to "mold" society is the issue. It's not a question of sin or anyone's interpretation of the Bible, but of the power we want to give other men over our lives and decisions, and whether we are going to trust them to make the decisions that we as individuals, don't seem to trust ourselves to make.
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

Craig Caudill made this comment,
hello I read your comment about gay marriage and catch 22, which I've been meaning to read. As for the moral aspects againsts homosexuals. if you read the bible jesus never said anything against gays, and I don't take anything that could or could not be interpreted as such. because the bible is too vague. I wonder why there was not an Elleventh comandment on this topic? maybe God didn't think it was that important?
now other parts of the bible like the old testament is quit out of date.
I thinks that was the whole point of what jesus was all about. i mean if you read some stuff about who can and cannot enter a church is quit retarded. So what jesus said was it's really about a personal relationship with God. it's not about Rules and regulations for humans to expect everyone to follow or Punish certain behavior.
I'm not saying you feel this way. But I know lots conservative christians do.
Now being married myself and who does have gay friends. i don't think if they had the right to get married that it would trivialize my marriage or make my marriage any less important.
I think people who feel that way are Stuck up snobs, who if it were a hundreds years ago, would be saying the same thing about Black peopple or whites and blacks getting married.
i don't think people should be creating legislation for moral reasons to affect how everyone else behaves. with acception to of course Children. Victimless crimes are another matter
Now the tax benefit is only one example for reasons why gay people want to get married. if people had the guts to get to know ones nieghborsand stop playing power trip and pushing people around, there might be some understanding around here.
in my opinion which doesn't mean much to lots of people. Our country is being destroyed by the powers that be, both Political and Corporate. the Creed is greed and lots of fear. This is what people should be worried about. Not queer eye or spongebob squarpants.
Again I'm not saying you feel this. You obviously stated everyones rights should be protected. I'm also letting you know in no way was i trying to trash how you feel. I value most opinions that come from a good place, wether I agree or not.
peace
Craig
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005
function pS(p){if(p.height>48){p.height=48;}}
El Borak made this comment,
Hi, Craig. Thanks for quoting this and for your response. If you followed the link to "Godjilla", you'll see that we had quite a discussion going, and that it (almost) remained civil. I was pretty happy to see that was the case, as it's rather a rare occurrence.
I would like to address one point you made, just to clarify my position. Since you're a new reader there, you may not have the background that a lot of my readers do, so rather than repeating it over there, I figured I'd bring it over here.
You said: "if you read the bible jesus never said anything against gays, and I don't take anything that could or could not be interpreted as such. because the bible is too vague. I wonder why there was not an Elleventh comandment on this topic? maybe God didn't think it was that important?"
Now, I do read the Bible and you are correct that he never mentions homosexuality. There are two possible reasons for that. The first is that it's not important and the second is that it was simply not an issue in 1st century Judaism. He never mentions meth production, marriage licences, environmentalism, animal cruelty, smuggling, borders, or a host of other things that we moderns deal with. But I think that if we look at his society and some of the other things he said (like about marriage), we can draw some indication about his teachings through that.
I, like Jesus, approach marriage via what I call the "Creation Principle". That is, that God created mankind to act in a certain way. For example:
Jesus answered them, "Have you not read that God who made them in the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cling to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh?'
Therefore they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate."
Then they asked him, "Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away?"
And he answered, "Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, allowed you to divorce your wives: but from the beginning it was not so".-- Matt 19:4-8
Now, we can glean a bit of the Creation Principle from this, and why I, as a Christian, don't think that principle ought to necessarily be part of the law.
First point: God created male and female, and Jesus was very concerned that individuals respect the permanence of marriage. Why? First and foremost, because it was a work of God.
Second point: God IS willing to change the law to deal with humans as we are. In this case, He gave Moses the ability to allow divorce, and it was a lot easier to get divorced in ancient Israel than it is in modern America. All it took was a "Dear John" letter.
But just because divorce was legal does not make it "moral". It's allowed, but Jesus commanded his diciples to treat marriage as permanent (in the next sentence). But even then there was an exception: that of unfaithfulness on the part of a spouse.
Jesus' morality, in this case, derived from the purpose for which man was created, but the law had to deal with the reality of imperfect people.
I approach (and I think Jesus would have approached) homosexual conduct the same way. In other words, homosexual conduct, like adultery and divorce, are not part of God's design for man (He created them 'male and female' to become one), therefore they are outside God's will and thus a sin.
BUT the law needs to deal with man is he exists, as a flawed creature who simply cannot do God's will in all areas, even under threat of sanction. God allowed divorce because of the stubbornness of the Israelites, but that never made it right or admirable or even desireable. But it did make it, in some cases anyway, the lesser of 2 evils.
Now, I say all that as a Christian, but a lot of Christians do not draw a distinction between legality and morality. In fact, most people, Christian or not, want "banned" things they find immoral, like animal cruelty for example.
However, I'm not a conservative (at least not in the George Bush sense), I'm a libertarian. I believe the purpose of government is spelled out in the Declaration of Independence, that government is to protect God-given rights to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness (property), and that whether people bugger one another is not really the business of government, unless the rights of a person are being violated.
So could I ever personally approve of a homosexual union? No, any more than I could approve of a man married to his mother or his dog. But, it's not up to me to approve it. I would try to help the person overcome such a sin/temptation/attitude if he wanted it (and I, too, have gay friends, some of whom are now happily and heterosexually married), but no force of law can make them change, any more than the law against adultery can keep me from being tempted heterosexually.
Now, I know that's a lot of noise, but I just wanted to clarify the point that I'm not "against" gays any more than I'm "against" adulterers (in fact, if I'm "against" any it would be the latter, as there we have an innocent victim, the spouse). I do not approve of their actions because I believe them to be harmful to themselves and in violation of the creation principle.
The Creation Principle says things are not sins simply because God says they are. Rather, He says they are sins because they are (note the swapping of cause and effect). God wants us to live in a certain way, because that's the way we were created, and true joy can only come to a human by living in the way God created him to live.
comment added :: 23rd January 2005, 18:14 GMT



Frank Fathom made this comment,
Interesting. in light of that many people can still contrue that Jesus when He said
Jesus answered them, "Have you not read that God who made them in the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave father and mother, and shall cling to his wife, and the two shall be one flesh?'
it still seems like he was only talking about a relationship between men and women.
also I can't make the comparrisons with acts of homosexuality to that of Selling meth on the street, animal cruelty, because those are negative things. Now in relationships there are different kinds and various degrees. Because it all depends on whats in your heart.
Thanks i appreciate our frienldy debate.
comment added :: 24th January 2005, 13:23 GMT
Leave a comment to this blog-entry

Life Aquatic

Life Aquatic

See It's been awhile since I've been here. I'm working on my video projects, which is coming along very slowly. over Christmas holiday I saw the best movie Life Aquatic
If your slow stupid and not into subtle humor that spills into serious Craziness. Then this movie isn't for you. This movie is now in my top lists of favorite movies. I'm listening to the sountrack It's awesome If you like David Bowie sung in portugese. I hope I spelled this right. Anyone who knows me knows I'm a big Bowie Fan. I feel this Sountrack is wonderful tribute to Bowie, but in a not so obvious way. The soundtrack includes music by Devo joan Baez The Stooges And Bowie Himself. I recomend the film and Sountrack to anyone who likes an unusual mix of songs.

posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

Currently working on New Video Project. Not sure what it will be. I think the theme is about Anomalies in image and human beings. maybe. These things have to come to me
Stay Tuned
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

More info on me

Okay to give you an idea of what i do this link is in french at the very bottom I am mentioned. For some reason which I am okay with I am known as Controlled by Bees in France. Not Craig Caudill. This link is about events that happened early may of this year. My name is not listed but Controlled by Bees is. its at the very bottom.
http://beadoa.free.fr/NETEX/NETEX050410.html
I will submit more as I find them. I suggest every one to google themselves.
http://www.nuits-sonores.com/ns2004/pages/prog/parcours.php
the next one is a pdf document you have to acrobat or something it consists of a 105 pages. I'm listed on page 38 or 40. I'm not sure. I'm doing this to keep tabs of these things.
http://www.nuits-sonores.com/ns2004/docs/nuits_sonores_04_presse.pdf
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

Older Blog Entries from jan 2005

Due to the Fact that i created other blogs and since I found out that "A O Smell" doesn't archive anything. I have recreate or save my entries here. So Ejoy!!
just had a bad dream, aparently i was whitney houston and bobby was chasing me around the house with a chainsaw, saying
I'm the ghost of ron jeremy, I am the wind. feel my wrath!!!!
then I'm me again standing in line at some lunch wagon Lou Dobbs. he's telling me about how much he loves the Back Street Boys latest CD.

posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

Animal Cruelty

Down below is a dream i had years ago. I realise how much i hate cute art and how artists who struggle to express themselves get shit on. but Suck ASS Artists are the Toast of the town. Well heres a big Fuck off to Mr William Wegman.
I hope You like this dream
okay hows this for cruelty to animals
I dreamed that I was famed photographer William Wegman With those famous grey fancy dogs. as far as I'm concerned give me a retarded Mut anyday. what happened was, I was doing a photo shoot, with two dogs on a tennis court. I had the miserable bastards dressed up like tennis players. with matching sweat bands on their paws and sweat bands arround their heads. One of them had a preppy sweater tied around his neck all preppy like. I had the two dogs on a platform of somekind to make it look as if their standing on their hind legs.
Now the fact they are standing there armed with Tennis Rackets, doesn't mean they have the knowledge or the ability to defend themselves in hand to hand Combat... Knowing this, I made My move. To this day I don't understand, was it for degradation to make them feel small or did I snap? When I began screaming at the top of My lungs. "I'm a Weimerranner!!! I'm a Weimerranner!!! I walked to the first dog on my right and kept screaming "I'm a Weimeranner!! I'm a Weimerranner!!! He just looked at me with his head tilted to the side.
Knowing I had the Upper Hand. I gave the first dog the fists of fury. the stupid dog got a left upper cut to the lower midsection. He falls off the platform, hunched over and yelping and howling, and eventually puking his guts out.
the next dog, I think her name was daisy, was just as stupid as the last. she just stood there with her head cocked to the side, and wagging her tail all cute like. I screamed "I am weimeranner, I am a Weimeranner!!!!
After she gave a gleeful cute bark that everyone tear up inside and make them wanna buy an expensive dog that was bread for specific tastes and special treatment, but eventually grows up and they get rid of the dogs, I sucker Punched her, she was out cold. This kind of thing happened all day.. It was a Massacre
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

28 Days Later review

So far I like this better than my other Blog, I just Ron Burgundy again It's really funny. also last night I saw the remake of dawn of the dead. Now even though It was filmed very well. I thought it was a useless remake.
Ving Rhames is always cool. But the movie lacked the edge that 28 days later had. Of course there was some humorous scenes where Ving is playing Chess on the roof of the mall. but the movie i thought did not have to be made. In many aspects I thought it was a direct rip off of 28 days later especially with the very quick edits of opening scenes.
which seemed to promise a lot of edgy film work, which as the movie slowly progresses just turns out to be just an ordinary film. another aspect I find very flawed was the fact that in " DAWN " was how fast people turned into Zombies just like in 28 days. but later on when somebody gets bitten by a zombie, for some reason they don't turn right away. More like days. personally I don't find it very consistant to the plot. I feel The new Dawn conveniently stole The 28 Days later plot and then reverted back to the George Romero's Plot of people slowly becoming Zombies.
When It comes to plots or how things happen I think It should always be consistent. i think the director and producers owe the George Romero and the people who created 28 days a Big apology.
now I've read alot of reviews by people who saw this, and to my surprise they seemed to like it. As you read this I know you won't be shocked to find that I think people are morons, without any taste in anything. I find people to be more accepting of anything mediocre. maybe people miss a good scare flick, and since we have been bombarded with Shit by Wes Craven, that when something else comes along they get excited. I'm not sure you tell me.
posted Sunday, 23 January 2005

previous posts

I think I'm a closet abba fan, not sure really, I like the meter or movenment of Dancing Queen, i don't know there something about the Swedes. Maybe I have this sweden fetish or something.
There is this band I really enjoy they are called Komeda, which they named themselves after the Polish Composer to best describe them. imagine an austin powers movie or a james bond movie dubbed in swedish.
I remember being a kid, and I used to worry about being cool. the music I listened to, which I found to be very therapeutic was of course heavy metal. As a tenager it seemed to take the edge off. I guess then I knew how to use music and the pwer it has I guess?
being 34 yrs old now I wished I could listen it again with a straight face. but now I feel Old but in a not so bad sort of way. In some ways I feel I've grown up, and yet I didn't want to.
But what exactly what is growing up anyway? yes you get older, but developing tastes in food music and other things, I'm not sure that constitutes as mature sophistication. you tell me.
now back to being cool. We all seem to have this idea of what we like and We hope everyone else thinks its cool too. i guess thats what determines if people likes you or not. anway I remember back to what albums I used to buy.
Slayer Megadeth Anthrax, metal Church, Maiden, Danzig, Misfits Etc, top that with Black Metal T shirts and you get to differentiate yourself between the Jocks the Preps and the geeks. right? so the last that you would want to be caught with is a Motley Crue Tape or Winger or Poison.
Well I remember I went into a record store and baught this tape by Hanoi Rocks.
they were glam band from Finland. since they were a glam band and being from Finland, they were a little different than anyone else. they didn't have an LA sound and they weren't pretty enough I guess to excite Chicks. There songs were a little Odd and at face value a little Cheeesy. Because of this they never really caught on with American audiences. just a small cult following.
I remember buying the tape Self Distruction Blues and let me tell you, i baught other tapes that day, but thats the only one I remember buying, and still own till this day. i got more kicks out of that album that alot of tapes I baught in a long time. to make a long story short. Not many people are into Hanoi Rocks, and not many people knew "IT WAS MY BAG" So I kinda kept it a secret for awhile, until one day I was at a party with a couple of friends. who were listening to crap like Pantera. God I was going to Vomit. i feel very alienated when forced to listen to such dribble. anyway latter after the party was coming to a close This guy david who was not my friend but i thought he was ok. he said to me in a drunkened stupor. "I'm so glad your cool now Craig."
"Whats thats supposed to to mean?" i said. " I remember when you came into Phils records because I used to work there, and You came in baught a hanoi Rocks tape?"
"really?" I said, "well guess what? I still have that tape and I actually like it.
David had no comment after that.
It always seemed like i had defend my ideas, or what I liked. Even though I'm very opinionated when It comes to corporate crap I hear every day. I'm very brutal about it sometimes, and sometimes I just say nothing when someone tells me they like this artist or that one. I don't want someone to have to defend themselves in case I disagree... Unless I have to hear it for a long period of time.
i suppose the point I'm trying to make is that as I get older, I feel I can listen to whateve I Fucking want. something with more variation, I feel I'm too old to be cool, so I can follow my own rules now.
So far this one of the few things I like about getting older.
posted Saturday, 22 January 2005

I'm trying to find a Blog thats fits my rantings, anyway here goes nothing. I'm planning on taking my old blog put these entries here I guess.
later vannilla sky king.
posted Saturday, 22 January 2005

Picture of Me

New Blog

making Transfer of blog to this space to give my Rambling some archives.
bare with me in this time of woe

ok just kidding